September 13, 2014
Nousletter Inaugural Edition, First Issue (Number #0)
Sheltering the Sophianic Vision
[The Nousletter letterhead features a detail of the Crab Nebula, M1, remnant of a supernova that occurred in 1054 AD. Photograph by Hugo Palomares. Full image.]
Navigational parameters: Currently, since early July, there is a stall of the lunar apogee with jupiter in converge. It is happening in the CRAB (zodiacal sign Leo) until mid-October.
Crab in its natural habitat, tidepool and ledges, coastal Maine:
CRAB: shell fish, shelter, hard shell, soft inside. Image of supersaturation.
This link describes how to make hard sugar candy by supersaturation:
http://chem.answers.com/definitions/the-definition-of-supersaturated
TVM: Treasure Valley Mysterium. Picture a building nestled in Treasure Valley (Guadiaro) in the Serrania de Ronda, Andalucia, Spain.
River Guadiaro (scroll down)
http://www.absoluteaxarquia.com/nature/rivers.html#thumb
Picture this building as I do. Exactly as I do. Match your visualization precisely to mine so that we all practice with the same icon (yidam). Matching is the first step of the Gaian Tantric practice of “match and merge“, comparable to the generation and completion stages of Atiyoga in Dzoghen, the consummate school of Tibetan Buddhism. This technique in its Gaian Tantric extrapolation is the speciality of Tantra Mother.
NOTE: Atiyoga, also called Anuyoga or Anuttara Yoga. “Yoga” applies to the merge action, uniting the visualization of the icon with your own body. Considered to be the highest yoga.
“On the completion stage, we cause the energy-winds (rlung, Skt. prana) to enter, abide, and dissolve in the central channel. This enables us to access the subtlest level of mental activity (clear light, ‘ od-gsal) and use it for the nonconceptual cognition of voidness – the immediate cause for the omniscient mind of a Buddha. We use the subtlest level of energy-wind, which supports clear light mental activity, to arise in the form of an illusory body (sgyu-lus) as the immediate cause for the network of form bodies (Skt. rupakaya) of a Buddha.
(From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Completion_stage)
JLL NOTE: In the standard practice, the shift from generation (picturing the icon or yidam) to completion or perfection (materialization). occurs as described here: the yidam is dissolved into the body of the meditator. Spectacular effects are said to arive. Ultimately, the rainbow body (Nirmanakaya) is materialized. But for the Aeon Sophia the “rainbow body” is the spectrum of colors and ethnicities of the fully self-actualized Anthropine animal. Also, in Gaian Tantra, the central channel is not in the body: the body is in the channel, in the groove of the BEMA (bioelectromagnetic aura) that defines your life-path by a vital signature Sophia can read, tag, and “load”. (Instruction of Mirita on the law of Conduction).
The planetary animal mother uses the vital airs (rlung, prana) of her telluric to boost human intention, as we know. Uniquely in Correction, the Aeon Sophia uses her pranic currents to transmit DI directly to human bodies so that it becomes instantaneously actional, able to be acted upon.
At the start of the current stall, the nav kept seeing a snippet of photographic film in his mindd’s eye, like a floater in your eyeball. With this odd impression came the instruction: “Present the icon.”
Setting the match: I drew what was on the snippet of film. Then, by a sudden jump of constellating action, I compared the drawing of the TVM homebase to what came up in an Internet search for “chemical structure of nucleic acid”. The iconic home site for TVM is modeled on the “crystal structure of a D-lysine-based chiral PNA-DNA duplex oligomer.”
My sketch:
One version of the chemical structure of nucleic acid. (Correction in talk: nucleic, not nuclear).
http://www.pnas.org/content/100/21/12021/F1.expansion.html
TVM = the name for the first cell, its physical node, locale, venue. This icon replicates fractally in different locations. “Present the icon.” An act of Gaian Tantric magic: visualization of the TVM, a local cell, propagates the appearance of all cells across the planet. This propagation is decentralized, like the spread of mycelium tendrils. The process of materialization uses the atmospheric conditions of supersaturation.
Talk correction: I said the outside patio or multi-levelled porch (permaculture gardens?) is off the west wing of the T, but it is off the east wing, on the left.
DI during the stalll and converge: Special role of Miss Piggy in Correction, leading instruction under her signature. Her specialities:
– release from pretending
– five-skull crown initiation
– match and merge
– certain tantric rites
– supersaturation
The presence of Thelete: EU, plasma cosmology. Recent talk contains language which is a near-perfect paraphrase of the FGS. Later nousletter. The two parts of the oral nousletter will be: instructional and topical.
Other topics to be considered: Topics: Morbido, the Nation of Islam, the gender rift (relative to MRA and the blowback against feminism), the Russia/Amerika front (Bhagavad Gita). Electric Universe, Ernst Zunder (saturn in the Scales), white genocide, the archontic infection (AI), romantic individualism, pornography, and more. Easy on the Jew-bashing, cut back on personal anecdotal material, reminiscences, etc. Make sure opinions are framed in the gnostic perspective, not just opinions.
The Question of Suffering
Tantra Mother is the Hostess who welcomes newcomers into PT. Not everyone is welcome, of course. Spoilers and psychopaths are not welcome. Those with messianic pretences and new age agendas are not welcome. And not all those who are welcomed have the disposition to enter the Mysterium. Everyone who wishes to enter the Mysterium faces the same test: to stand before the question of suffering and define it, as Parzival did. It has to be this way, not because I say so, but due to the sxpeical conditions presented to humanity at large by open disclosure of the Organic Light.
The king came back to us, so pale, and all his strength gone from him, a doctor’s hand delved into the wound until he found the spearhead… [Witnessing this, the Company of the Grail] said, “Who is to be the protector of the Grail’s mysteries?” Then bright eyes wept. – Wolfram von Eschenbach, Parzival 9.480
GNE —> KWP. a natural/supernatural progression.
________
Part Two of the special introductory edition. Topic: Lucifer
It is high time for a major correction on this topic. Redice interview with Jeanice Barcelo provides the occasion for application of some gnostic scrutiny:
August 8, 2014
http://www.redicemembers.com/secure/radio/program.php?id=884
Read comment titled ‘THE JEWS” – I concur. Anti-Jueish material and quotes may be planted by pro-Jue agents who want to foment anti-semitism and, by a clever turn (“By deception we shall conquer”), plant false quotes which, were they true, would expose the Juman agenda and condemn its agents — but proven to be false, these quotations show that Jumans are not as anti-human as some people would have the world believe. Of course, there are plenty of anti-goyim, anti-human statements in Juish literature and recorded words, but a few such statements, proven to be falsified by non-Jues, tempers the charge that Jues are openly hostile toward non-Jues.
Take note of the following:
“To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if they knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.” – Libbre David 37.
“If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Who ever will violate this order shall be put to death.” Libbre David 37.
As far as I can tell, the “Libbre David” does not exist in the Talmudic canon. These citations are fabricated.
In part two, Barcelo goes on a riff about Lucifer. Entirely misconceived, misleading, irresponsible. She needs to stay in her sandbox. I offer these comments and corrections:
First, on a positive note, and resonating to the instruction of Tantra Mother to her children, consider the term “Pristine Human”
A term cited by Barcelo from the Anastasia books. Sophianic view: the pristine human comprises all ethnic colors and tendencies, the “rainbow body” (Nirmanakaya) of the Anthropos. The “pristine human” is not white in ethnic typology: whiteness is always a reference to access to the Organic Light, which is white. The “pristine human” reveals itself in a full spectrum of ethnicity.
The Goddess is white (Organic Light), her children come in all colors.
Consider the gnostic intel on this theme: those who access the OL can achieve the telos, the true aim and purpose of humanity. The adjective for telos is teleios, a word found hundreds of times in the Gnostic Coptic writings. Also, the Coptic word for humanity is rhome, pronounced row-MAY. The equivalent Greek word for humanity in those texts is anthropos. Hence, Greek anthropos = Coptic rhome.
In numerous passages you find the term PETELIEOS RHOME. “PE” is the Coptic definite article, the. PETELEIOS RHOME is usually translated “the perfected humanity.” Scholars favor “perfect” as the translation for teleios, but I propose “ultimate.” PETELEIOS RHOME could be translated as “the pristine human, ultimate humanity, ultrahuman.” Aryan is also a correlate for pristine human. Arya in Sanskrit means “noble, elevated, pristine.”
“Christianity is on the leading edge of trying to preserve morals.” Barcelo says. Is that so? What is her moral agenda, her views on birth control, etc? What does she have to say about pagan, pre-christian morals? If the spiritual battle now underway requires a renaissance of indigenous identity and culture, recovering ways of life in harmony with nature that existed before Judaeo-Christian-Islamic mind control became dominant on this planet, what about finding our morals there in the natural world as well? Rather than in the framework Christian morality and the specious teachings of Jesus.
Does anyone out there advocate Pagan morality and Gaian morality? Of course, to do so, you would have to know first what Gaian morality is, and how it differs from Christian morality. I consider the definition of Gaian ethics and Pagan morality to be essential to the spiritual battle underway. Those who believe they can find the morality for a sustainable and humane social order in Christianity are, in my opinion, profoundly deluded. Listen to Rajneesh “Love and Hate Are One” (YT clip). He says brilliantsly that the teachings about love have destroyed the authentic capacity for love.
…Now, at long last, concerning that dazzling dude who fell from heaven:
Or was it a dude?
O My Goddess, it’s Elvira, Mistress of the Dark!
I would recognize those boobs
even if I was remote-viewing from a faraway galaxy.
Riding on the bandwagon with countless others, Barcelo naively claims that the evil Jews worship Lucifer. This is a red herring, often served with bagel and lox in a Beverly Hills deli I used to frequent. . Who the frack is Lucifer? Has anyone ever met Lucifer? I think not. Bear in mind that a faction of the ancient Hebrews made a pact with the Archons who lied to them. But the Archons are not Lucifer, nor is that entity their overlord.
The warning about the Jews in the Gnostic intel as is clear as a bell, although it comes from the dossier of the prosecution:
Ialdabaoth himself chose a certain man named Abraham from among the nations, and made a covenant with him, to the effect that, if his seed continued to serve him, the Archons would give to them the earth for an inheritance. Afterwards, by means of Moses, Ialdabaoth brought forth Abraham’s descendants from Egypt, and gave them the law, and made them the Jews.
– Irenaeus Book One, Ch 30, section 10: I.30,10
Archons do not practice disinfo, mixing truth and lies. They do nothing but lie. And Jews enmeshed in the archontic delusions of the Zaddikim tell lies, even when they think they are asserting the truth about their own deviant culture. Hence, it the evil-doing Jews in the world today, such as the Rothschild crime family (cheap shot), admitted that they were worshiping Lucifer, they would be telling a lie. But people believe their own lies, and go to elaborate lengths to enact them, don’t they?
I have yet to see anyone on the internet who can comment in a sober manner about Lucifer. So let me wind up the long sleeves of my yukata and give it a try. The version of the Lucifer myth Jeanice Barcelo cites is widely repeated but rarely deconstructed along critical lines. Mythological evidence is no different than evidence at a crime scene: it has to be forensically examined and evaluated. There can be planted mythological evidence, and there is a fair amount of distorted mythological material — contaminated evidence. How to work through all this messy stuff?
Go straight to the heart of the matter: The popular version of the Lucifer myth as a luminous angel thrown down from heaven — for WHOT-EVAH reason — is a distortion and cover for the Valentinian teaching about the fall of the Wisdom Goddess. According to the Valentinian variant (NHLE, p 481 “A Valentinian Exposition”, XI, 2) the Aeon Sophia sought to be equal to the Originator, the power beyond all the Aeons, and acted without a consort, thereby violating the wish of the Orginator “not to allow anything to happen in the Pleroma apart from a syzygy” (XI, 2:36). Or roughly so. the passage is very damaged and garbled. It alludes to Sophia’s “Son” as it he were the one who descends or falls from the Pleroma: “he willed himself bodily to leave the powers and he descended” (Ibid., passage 33).
In short, Sophia’s alleged act of arrogance presumption of power, exceeding Aeonic limits, caused her to be ejected from the Pleroma. For this behavior, she is described as prunikos, “outrageous, impetuous, audacious.” But there is no judgement of sin or betrayal in the Gnostic perspective, as often occurs in loose talk about Lucifer. On the contrary, what I call “Wisdom’s Dare” is a delight to the Propater/Originator, the supreme ancestor god or “heavenly father,” source of the Aeons. Or so I would prefer to see it.
The unexamined mythic material about Lucifer says he was “cast out.” The Fallen Goddess scenario says that Sophia plunged due to her enthusiasm, enthumysis, overweening passion, empathy, excitement.
A book privately published by the Hermetic Library in Amsterdam, From Poimandres to Jacob Bohme: Gnosis, Hermetism, and the Christian Tradition (In de Pelikaan, 2000) cites an extremely rare source: the commentary of the Alexandrian thelogian Dydymus the Blind (ca. 313 – 398), in De Trinitate III, 42:
“Valentinus taught that the last of the thirty Aeons is androgyne and that is Sophia. She wanted to see the highest god and was repelled by his Splendour; (hence) she fell out of the heavens (pleroma).”
My emphasis. It is extremely difficult to find an explicit statement of the fall/plunge in ancient materials.
Consider the syntax in this fragment: introducing the fall or betrayal meme, and stating that Sophia fell from inability to behold the Splendour of the Originator. Well, that is one opinion or perspective that may have been discussed in Alexandrian circles in the time of Hypatia. You have to consider variants of, first, motive, and then, consequence. Did the motive (to see the highest god, the Originator) lead to the consequence (being repelled, rejected)? I say that this proposition is corrupt. How can the Divine Source reject anything to which it gives rise? I argue that no Aeonic divinity was ever cast out of heaven for offending the supreme source, the Originator. Never happened, never will.
Nor would you, a mere mortal, be rejected for acting on the same motive.
Rumor has it that Lucifer was “cast down from heaven” for pride or for not worshiping Adan — WHOT-EVAH — and did a lot of evil things out of spite, presumably trying to prove he was equal to the highest god, or just for the fiendish fun of messing with god’s plan. The Marvel Comics version of the Lucifer story covers and conceals the influence of the archons, but there is another confounding factor at play here as well: What about those “fallen angels” in the Bible, the Nephilim? Is Lucifer one of them, or their overlord, perhaps? Are the Nephilim the Archons themselves?
NOTE: I leave this tricky issue to a long essay on Sophia / Lucifer to be posed on metahistory.org. jll 9 July 2015
Barcelo and countless others fail to undertake the investigation required to discover the true identity of Lucifer, and do not even pretend to try. They repeat rumors and spread error in a totally irresponsible way. I condemn them and call them out for their ignorance and negligence concerning a topic of supreme importance for humanity.
Conclusion: There is no Luciferian evil entity. The true Lucifer is Sophia. Her story is slandered and distorted in the popular legend of Lucifer.
Lucifer, the light-bringer, was originally a name for the Aeon Sophia herself. She brings the Organic Light to the natural world, and she brings enlightenment to the human mind when human animals encounter her using the telestic method of questioning.
The term “SOPH” appears at the apex of the cabalistic tree of life. “AIN SOPH AUR” might be translated “aeonic wisdom light or aura.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ein_Sof
Clearly, AIN SOPH AUR is a name for the Organic Light in its auric or atmospheric modality, ensheathing the earth. So, do some Jews who dabble in Cabala know Sophia in the epiphany of the Organic Light, and worship it, calling it Lucifer? No. Impossible. Here is why not: The Archons gave the Jews the Cabala, deceiving them into the belief that it is the blueprint of the universe. To prove they were supergods who could raise the Chosen People to their level, the archons had to present evidence for the false claim that they created the universe — so they placed AIN SOPH AUR at the top of the blueprint. They gave the Zads the visionary icon of the Cabalistic “Tree of Life” , along with some mantric formulas (basis of Hebrew sound magic and “Jewish prayers”) as proof that they, the archons, were at the source of the entire universe. But that claim is totally fraudulent.
(I may talk in more depth about the cabalistic delusion at some future moment. I would have to tackle the Zohar, which is a fracking nightmare.)
For now just let me propose that anyone who claims that the evil-doing Jews (Zads) worship Lucifer is ignorantly repeating a lie coming from the Archons who want their proxies, “the Jews”, to believe that they, the Archons, can reveal the Source, the Organic Light, Aeonic Wisdom Light, Ain Soph Aur. But archons, including Yaldabaoth, are blind. They perceive by radio frequencies not sensory visual instrumentation. They do not even know the universe exists beyond the solar system, so how can they present a blueprint for it? The Sephirotic “Tree of Life” is a tricked-out model of the solar system, which is the only realm known to archons within the range of their radio-wave scanning frequencies.
The true Lucifer is Sophia whose presence in the Organic Light indwells the earth. The fragmentary allusion to the Graal as the stone that fell from the crown of Lucifer when he plunged from heaven, echoed in Wolfram’s Parzival, confirms this statement: the Wisdom Stone (material luminosity) of her “crown” (the focal Aeonic power, pronoia) fell to earth as she herself morphed into the planetary body.
And that immaculate light is present today in the natural, sensorially observable body of the planet, materially immanent.
I rest my case.
jll : September 13, 2014 Andalucia
Revised with missing text: 8 July 2015
Essay in development for metahistory.org:
The True Lucifer is Sophia – AIN SOPH AUR: The Living Luminosity of the Earth